*BSD News Article 14702


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.questions:1749 comp.os.386bsd.bugs:522
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions,comp.os.386bsd.bugs
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!agate!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!gatech!concert!sas!mozart.unx.sas.com!torpid.unx.sas.com!sastdr
From: sastdr@torpid.unx.sas.com (Thomas David Rivers)
Subject: Re: silo overflows and failed fixes -- trying syscons-0.2 and trap 12
Sender: news@unx.sas.com (Noter of Newsworthy Events)
Message-ID: <C5qt32.65J@unx.sas.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1993 18:09:02 GMT
References: <1993Apr18.202524.12821@csi.com>
Nntp-Posting-Host: torpid.unx.sas.com
Organization: SAS Institute Inc.
Keywords: syscons-0.2,CGD,com-beta.0.2.1,silo overflow
Lines: 51

In article <1993Apr18.202524.12821@csi.com> bkp@csi.com (Brian K. Pheiffer) writes:
>I've been running a 486DX (with patch level 0.2.2, Orchid Prodesigner
>IIs, 3com 3c503 at 0xDC000, com1, com2, com4 at irq 5, 32Mb, Maxtor IDE
>230 Mb) with no problem except silo overflows.  I've been trying 
>different ways to fix this problem but keep hitting a wall.
>
>I first tried Gene Stark's mods to CGD's comkit.  This booted and
>worked fine except I wasn't able to use my com ports *at all*.  Every
>command (tip,cu,kermit) would hang trying to open the port.
>
>I saw that his was based on patchkit 0.2.2 + syscons-0.2 so I tried
>installing syscons-0.2.  I rebuilt the kernel and right before the
>fsck check on reboot -- the kernel paniced with:
>
>| trap type 12 code = fe010002 eip = fe0103d5 cs = 8 eflags = 10206 \
>| cr2 2726148 cpl 4040
>| panic: trap
>| hit reset please
>
>So that wasn't optimal.  I also tried CGD's com-beta.0.2.1 patches,
>but they also had the same problem as Stark's: I couldn't open the
>devices.
>
>I'm fairly sure the source tree was clean before trying each of these
>three senarios since I rebuild a plain kernel between each.
>
>All I'm trying to do is fix the com port silo overflow problem.  Any
>suggestions on which approach or what I could try next?
>
>Brian Pheiffer
>bkp@csi.com

Brian -

  I found that Chris' latest two drivers seem to fail on *some*
16440 UARTs.   It does one of mine - but Chris and others report
it seems to work fine.  

  Do you have a 16450 or 16440?
  
  Anyway, I was successful using a previous incarnation of the
driver which preceeded the last two.

    - Dave Rivers -
   (sastdr@unx.sas.com (work))
   (rivers@ponds.uucp (home))
   


-- 
UPDATE ALL INFORMATION AND POD INTO COSMOS - Federal Express