Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.development Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!spool.mu.edu!uunet!psgrain!ee.und.ac.za!shrike.und.ac.za!hippo!train!aloe.ufh.ac.za!inus From: inus@aloe.ufh.ac.za (& Scheepers) Subject: Re: My experience with the upgrade to patchkit-0.2.2 Organization: University of Fort Hare, Alice, Ciskei Date: Mon, 29 Mar 93 07:24:13 GMT Message-ID: <1993Mar29.072413.21840@train.ufh.ac.za> X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3 References: <JKH.93Mar27155800@whisker.lotus.ie> Sender: news@train.ufh.ac.za (News System Admin.) Lines: 14 jkh@whisker.lotus.ie (Jordan K. Hubbard) writes: : >I neglected to say: I used a gcc-2.3.3 binary to recompile. Will try again : >with 1.39... Initial results look promising. : : AHEM.. Yes, that would have that effect. In case this isn't clear: : PLEASE DON'T USE GCC 2.x.x UNTIL I'VE COMPLETELY ENABLED THE SOURCE : TREE FOR THIS! I will make it very clear when this is the case. : It is a project, I do intend to do it, it's just not done yet. : I used gcc-2.3.3 to upgrade to patchkit 0.2.1, so I assumed it would continue to work on the 0.2.2 patchkit, as I've used it previously to compile all the usr.bin and usr.sbin utilities, as well as kernels ... Apologies to all.