Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.linux:31945 comp.os.386bsd.questions:1121 Newsgroups: comp.os.linux,comp.os.386bsd.questions Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!constellation!osuunx.ucc.okstate.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!crcnis1.unl.edu!wupost!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!yale.edu!ira.uka.de!smurf.sub.org!nadia!delos!tyrell.tynet.sub.org!marsu!root From: root@marsu.tynet.sub.org (Markus Wenzel) Subject: Re: 386bsd, linux: which runs more out of the box? References: <C4BowL.DK3@undergrad.math.waterloo.edu> <CGD.93Mar23030821@erewhon.CS.Berkeley.EDU> <hwr.732890376@snert.ka.sub.org> <SCT.93Mar23224452@belnahua.dcs.ed.ac.uk> <1oog8o$og4@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu> Organization: Palumbian Research Labs Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1993 09:15:19 GMT Message-ID: <1993Mar25.091519.439@marsu.tynet.sub.org> Lines: 19 mycroft@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu (Charles Hannum) writes: >In article <SCT.93Mar23224452@belnahua.dcs.ed.ac.uk> sct@dcs.ed.ac.uk >(Stephen Tweedie) writes: >> >> It is fairly safe to say that efs and minix-fs are bug free now. >Not a chance in Hell. efs is not stable. Who cares for efs? Since xiafs is included in the kernel source, efs is obsolete. I changed to xiafs on all partitions except root and I am quite happy with it. -- /dev Markus Wenzel, University of Stuttgart /usr/spool/mail wenzel@marsu.tynet.sub.org / @rus.uni-stuttgart.de ~/.ircrc/nick Marsu /etc/motd 'Linux' is no trademark of AT&T.