Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!emory!ogicse!psgrain!m2xenix!agora!rgrimes From: rgrimes@agora.rain.com (Rodney Grimes) Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.development Subject: Re: My experience with the upgrade to patchkit-0.2.2 Message-ID: <C4MMDC.ArL@agora.rain.com> Date: 29 Mar 93 01:19:59 GMT Article-I.D.: agora.C4MMDC.ArL References: <jms.43.733053919@cs.ufh.ac.za> <JKH.93Mar27011054@whisker.lotus.ie> <C4MIq3.I1A@nmrdc1.nmrdc.nnmc.navy.mil> Organization: Open Communications Forum Lines: 19 dsc3pzp@nmrdc1.nmrdc.nnmc.navy.mil (Philip Perucci) writes: >In article <JKH.93Mar27011054@whisker.lotus.ie> jkh@whisker.lotus.ie (Jordan K. Hubbard) writes: >>Don't forget - you have to unpack bin*, etc* AND src* from the distribution >>to be absolutely sure.. >Uh-oh... >IS the etc01 needed for clean patchkit 0.2.2, or is bin01 and src01 enough? >I just "re-cycled" my etc01 floppies because I thought the binaries were >to old to be of use... You can get by just fine with bin01 and src01, the 90000 series patches will not install. This should hold true from here on out. -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@agora.rain.com Accurate Automation Company All opinions belong to me and my company! Get your free copy of 386bsd from agate.berkeley.edu:/pub/386BSD via ftp! An out of work contractor... You need unix work done.... Send me your project!