Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.linux:31328 comp.os.386bsd.questions:1076 Newsgroups: comp.os.linux,comp.os.386bsd.questions Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!decwrl!netcomsv!netcom.com!hasty From: hasty@netcom.com (Amancio Hasty Jr) Subject: Re: 386bsd, linux: which runs more out of the box? Message-ID: <hastyC4I7u2.Hxw@netcom.com> Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest) References: <SCT.93Mar23224452@belnahua.dcs.ed.ac.uk> <1oqlf5$i8b@agate.berkeley.edu> <1993Mar25.173656.19166@swan.pyr> Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1993 16:15:37 GMT Lines: 24 Well, I am using old 386bsd 0.1 with a few patches. My concentration is on X servers. >I tried 386BSD and after discovering it stayed up for under 2 hours average Nice try, I compiled all of X several times which takes longer than 2 hours no problem. Ran rendering programs all night long no problem. Ran network management applications all night long no problem. >out of the box and that the serial ports only did 2400 I gave it up. Having Strange I downloaded mit-1, mit-2, and mit-3 at 9600 baud. Amancio Hasty -- This message brought to you by the letters X and S and the number 3 Amancio Hasty | Home: (415) 495-3046 | ftp-site depository of all my work: e-mail hasty@netcom.com | sunvis.rtpnc.epa.gov:/pub/386bsd/incoming