Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.linux:31530 comp.os.386bsd.questions:1096 Newsgroups: comp.os.linux,comp.os.386bsd.questions Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!constellation!osuunx.ucc.okstate.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!menudo.uh.edu!uuneo!sugar!peter From: peter@NeoSoft.com (Peter da Silva) Subject: Re: 386bsd, linux: which runs more out of the box? Organization: NeoSoft Communications Services -- (713) 684-5900 Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1993 23:35:40 GMT Message-ID: <C4KMvH.8tz@sugar.neosoft.com> Summary: I flame myself... References: <1ou728INNhfn@aludra.usc.edu> <ins407x.733191967@aurora.cc.monash.edu.au> <C4JopF.KrH@sugar.neosoft.com> Lines: 15 In article <C4JopF.KrH@sugar.neosoft.com> peter@NeoSoft.com (Peter da Silva) writes: > I was particularly disturbed on hearing Linux was using KA9Q as the base of > its networking code. I knew it was a bad idea when I did it, but I did it anyway. Call me a donkey and pin on my tail. The Linux code *isn't* related to KA9Q, though a lot of people have been running KA9Q on Linux for SLIP support. Well, it's an ill wind that blows no good... at least I found out something I didn't know before. And the rest of the article, especially the plea for peace, is still valid. -- Peter da Silva. <peter@sugar.neosoft.com>. `-_-' Oletko halannut suttasi tänään? 'U` Tarjoilija, tämä ateria elää vielä.