Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.linux:31096 comp.os.386bsd.questions:1031 Newsgroups: comp.os.linux,comp.os.386bsd.questions Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!constellation!osuunx.ucc.okstate.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!haven.umd.edu!uunet!pipex!marble.uknet.ac.uk!mcsun!julienas!jussieu!card From: card@masi.ibp.fr (Remy CARD) Subject: Re: 386bsd, linux: which runs more out of the box? Message-ID: <1993Mar25.073345.324@jussieu.fr> Sender: news@jussieu.fr (Le Facteur) Nntp-Posting-Host: ares.ibp.fr Organization: Laboratoire MASI - Universite Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris - France References: <C4BowL.DK3@undergrad.math.waterloo.edu> <hwr.732890376@snert.ka.sub.org>> <SCT.93Mar23224452@belnahua.dcs.ed.ac.uk> <mafm.732963822@warabi> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1993 07:33:45 GMT Lines: 30 In article <mafm.732963822@warabi> mafm@cs.uwa.oz.au (Matthew McDonald) writes: >Stephen Tweedie writes: > >>It is fairly safe to say that efs and minix-fs are bug free now. They >>have been around a long time (relative to Linux - they are all >>obviously younger than the BSD ffs). > > I don't think so. I can point you at people who lost gobs of >files to efs yesterday. No way is efs bug-free yet. Please do ! Tell these people that they'd better send me a mail with the description of their problems and, maybe, I'll be able to help and correct the bugs if I find some. If some people have problems with efs (or e2fs) but don't contact me to report them, I will never be able to know that these problems exist and to correct them, except if they hit me too (and that's quite unlikely to happen since I am a very satisfied user of efs and e2fs ;-) > >-- > Matthew McDonald mafm@cs.uwa.oz.au > Dare to be naive. -- Buckminster Fuller Remy -- Remy Card card@masi.ibp.fr