Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.linux:31003 comp.os.386bsd.questions:1008 Newsgroups: comp.os.linux,comp.os.386bsd.questions Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!ra!tantalus.nrl.navy.mil!eric From: eric@tantalus.nrl.navy.mil (Eric Youngdale) Subject: Re: 386bsd, linux: which runs more out of the box? Message-ID: <C4ErGo.1L9@ra.nrl.navy.mil> Sender: usenet@ra.nrl.navy.mil Organization: Naval Research Laboratory References: <hwr.732890376@snert.ka.sub.org> <SCT.93Mar23224452@belnahua.dcs.ed.ac.uk> <1oog8o$og4@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu> Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1993 19:29:11 GMT Lines: 19 In article <1oog8o$og4@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu> mycroft@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu (Charles Hannum) writes: > >In article <SCT.93Mar23224452@belnahua.dcs.ed.ac.uk> sct@dcs.ed.ac.uk >(Stephen Tweedie) writes: >> >> It is fairly safe to say that efs and minix-fs are bug free now. > >Not a chance in Hell. efs is not stable. Oh, brother. While it is true that the efs in the 0.98 kernels had bugs in it, the efs that is in the 0.99 kernels has tended to be quite stable. -Eric -- "When Grigor Samsa woke up one morning from unsettling dreams, he found himself changed in his bed into a monstrous vermin." -F. Kafka