Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.development Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!constellation!convex!convex!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!menudo.uh.edu!uuneo!sugar!peter From: peter@NeoSoft.com (Peter da Silva) Subject: Re: Shared libraries and 386bsd. Organization: NeoSoft Communications Services -- (713) 684-5900 Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1993 11:31:05 GMT Message-ID: <C4E5Bt.9CM@sugar.neosoft.com> References: <1993Mar15.064119.19323@hippo.ru.ac.za> <MCKIM.93Mar23082603@dinah.lerc.nasa.gov> <1onp3o$l3v@umd5.umd.edu> Lines: 12 In article <1onp3o$l3v@umd5.umd.edu> mark@elea.umd.edu (Mark Sienkiewicz) writes: > If you placed each shared library in it's own segment, you could link the > library based at 0 and avoid some of the PIC problems. You pay for it > by dealing with the segmentation stuff. How do you handle callbacks from a library (big deal in X, but also important in qsort() and other base routines. -- Peter da Silva. <peter@sugar.neosoft.com>. `-_-' Oletko halannut suttasi tänään? 'U` Tarjoilija, tämä ateria elää vielä.