*BSD News Article 13293


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve comp.os.linux:31027 comp.os.386bsd.questions:1012
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux,comp.os.386bsd.questions
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!news.cs.jhu.edu!bogstad
From: bogstad@blaze.cs.jhu.edu (Bill Bogstad)
Subject: Re: 386bsd, linux: which runs more out of the box?
Message-ID: <1993Mar24.215511.11113@blaze.cs.jhu.edu>
Organization: Johns Hopkins Computer Science Department, Baltimore, MD
References: <CGD.93Mar23030821@erewhon.CS.Berkeley.EDU> <hwr.732890376@snert.ka.sub.org> <SCT.93Mar23224452@belnahua.dcs.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1993 21:55:11 GMT
Lines: 32

In article <SCT.93Mar23224452@belnahua.dcs.ed.ac.uk> sct@dcs.ed.ac.uk (Stephen Tweedie) writes:
>hwr@snert.ka.sub.org (Heiko W.Rupp) writes:
>
>> There is another thing to consider: 386bsd has a stable BSD-FFS and
>> stable networking, while there are bugs in the Linux efs and in their
>> networking.
>
>Whoah there!!!!
>
>To the very best of my knowledge - and filesystems is What I Do on Linux
>- there are no known bugs in the efs, minix or xiafs file systems.
>There is a bug in the triple indirection handling of e2fs - fixes to be
>released soon - but only files >64MB are affected.  There are also a
>couple of enhancements due in the e2fsprogs, too.
>
>It is fairly safe to say that efs and minix-fs are bug free now.  They
>have been around a long time (relative to Linux - they are all
>obviously younger than the BSD ffs). ...

Completely unsupported rumor follows...

	I seem to recall hearing that there is a known race condition in the
minix-fs which can cause problems and that there was no intention to fix it
since in the long run the minix-fs was "going away" and triggering the bug
was thought to be difficult.  Can somebody speak to this RUMOR please?

				Thanks,
				Bill Bogstad

P.S.  I still use the minix-fs on my Linux machine exclusively.  I have not
had any problem that I could in any way attribute to filesystem problems.
(Other then the 14 character name limit...)