Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.linux:30905 comp.os.386bsd.questions:984 Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!enterpoop.mit.edu!ai-lab!hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu!not-for-mail From: mycroft@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu (Charles Hannum) Newsgroups: comp.os.linux,comp.os.386bsd.questions Subject: Re: 386bsd, linux: which runs more out of the box? Date: 23 Mar 1993 21:15:52 -0500 Organization: dis Lines: 12 Message-ID: <1oog8o$og4@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu> References: <C4BowL.DK3@undergrad.math.waterloo.edu> <CGD.93Mar23030821@erewhon.CS.Berkeley.EDU> <hwr.732890376@snert.ka.sub.org> <SCT.93Mar23224452@belnahua.dcs.ed.ac.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: hal.ai.mit.edu In article <SCT.93Mar23224452@belnahua.dcs.ed.ac.uk> sct@dcs.ed.ac.uk (Stephen Tweedie) writes: > > It is fairly safe to say that efs and minix-fs are bug free now. Not a chance in Hell. efs is not stable. -- \ / Charles Hannum, mycroft@ai.mit.edu /\ \ PGP public key available on request. MIME, AMS, NextMail accepted. Scheme White heterosexual atheist male (WHAM) pride!