*BSD News Article 13152


Return to BSD News archive

Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!sdd.hp.com!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!ogicse!news.u.washington.edu!ns1.nodak.edu!plains.NoDak.edu!tjon
From: tjon@plains.NoDak.edu (Christopher C. Tjon)
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.bugs
Subject: PROBLEMS WITH PATCHKIT 0.2.2 - Advice/help needed :-(
Message-ID: <C4BLJ8.GA5@ns1.nodak.edu>
Date: 23 Mar 93 02:28:20 GMT
Article-I.D.: ns1.C4BLJ8.GA5
Sender: usenet@ns1.nodak.edu (Usenet login)
Organization: North Dakota Higher Education Computing Network
Lines: 100
Nntp-Posting-Host: plains.nodak.edu

I installed patchkit 0.2.2 this weekend and had the following experiences  I
would like to say first that this situation is an improvement over the past.

first:  I have a AMD 386dx/40 system with  16mb RAM,  adaptec 1542B with maxtor
LXT340s and Wangtek 5150es.  I have a et4000 super vga card with 1mb and an IIt
387 coprocessor.  As I was having many stability problems prior to this patchkit
I decided to go back to a vanilla system and start over.  I went all the way
back to low level formatting my drive, installed bin01 and src01.  after 
applying all the patches I ran afterinstall.sh(or whatever it was called) and
all seemed well.  I booted the new kernel etc an began to run the buildworld.sh
script.  here is where the trouble starts.  I figured that it would run for a 
bit so I started it up and went to bed.  When I got up my system was at login.
I suspected that it had crashed and rebooted so I started buildworld.sh again.
Sure enough it ran for a while and crashed.

The first time was compiling /usr/src/lib/libg++/libg++/gcd.cc  
The error message was:
	vm_fault(fe39a600,27eff000,3,0)->1
   	type c, code 2
	kernel: type 12 trap, code=0
	stopped at 0xfe0037fc: movl $0x6f430a20, 0x2a2ffee8(%ebp)
	db>
and the system hung.

first of all what is "db>" and what can you do with it.  I futily tried some
commands and got nothing so I rebooted. :-(

After rebooting gcd.cc compiled fine and we went on to ctype.cc
and got this one:
	kernel: type 9 trap, code=0
	stopped at 0xfe059065 imull $Qx75626922, %fs:0x74(%ebx),%esi
	db>

Again confusion prevailed and I had to reboot. :-(

I rebooted and restarted the compile this time getting to libtelnet
and got the following:
	nm: auth.o no name list
	nm: encrypt.o no name list
	nm: kerberos.o no name list
	nm: enc_des.o no name list
and the compile continued.  This concerned me so i interrupted it and restarted
it and then these errors did not appear.  What is going on?

From here the next trouble spot came when compiling libutil during kvm.c
the error message was:
	kernel: type 12 trap, code=0
	stopped at 0fe0519eb: addb %dl,0(%eax)
	db>
and I had to reboot again :-(

I have yet to compile the whole system.  GCC is going now maybe she will make it
:-)

A couple of other things.  I had my x stuff on a tape and decide to restore it.
Again I had problems the first few attempts be eventually made it.  The message
was: (note: this is using tar)
	kernel: type 12 trap, code=0
	stopped at 0xfe058005 addb 0(%ecx),%cl

Also what is the difference between XCONSOLE and UCONSOLE in a config file?

Why do I get a message when booting my new kernel that says DDB: no symbols?

What is /dev/com00?

Ocassionally pieces of my filesystem will disappear.  I will cd to somedirectory
only to find it saying ". not found".  I can do a cd / and get out but the
directory is gone.  If I reboot it mysteriously returns as if it had always been
there.  the same thing occurs with random individual files.  I will look at them
and find them filled with garbage and when I reboot they are fine.  This is TOO
weird :-( :-(.  one would think that if they were corrupted they would stay that
way.  Bear in mind that fsck reports no errors sometimes.  A few other times.  
it does not make a difference whether errors are found or not.  The problem is
resolved.  I have had a large reduction in general filesystem errors after
installing the new scsi stuff in the patchkit0.2.2 but this problem remains the 
same.

Overall i think my system is more stable now than it has ever been.  At least 
you can read the error message rather than missing it before the system reboots
as before.  Do I just need to suffer through the rest of the compile before 
things will stablize or what?   I would really like to get it figured out so 
that I can get a return on all the time I have put into it.  Any help will
be greatly appreciated.  Keep in mind that I was having mysterious reboots 
and filesystem problems prior to 0.2.2.  I find it difficult to believe that
there is anything wrong with my equipment.  It is all brand new and check out
on every diagnostic I can find to run on it.  Other os's such as linux and 
sco 3.2.4 have had no troubles on it at all.

Again any help will be greatly appreciated.  Feel free to email.  I can post
a summary of responses or you can post directly to the group.  either way
thanks in advance


-- 
Chris
		tjon@plains.nodak.edu	 Christopher C. Tjon
		uunet!plains!tjon (UUCP) Box 5224
		tjon@plains (Bitnet)	 Fargo, ND 58105-5224
This message brought to you by the letters X and S and the number 3.