Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!wupost!uunet!mcsun!sun4nl!tuegate.tue.nl!terra.stack.urc.tue.nl!tricky.wft.stack.urc.tue.nl!usenet From: michael@wft.stack.urc.tue.nl (Michael Brouwer) Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.development Subject: Re: Some ideas on the driver interface (New idea!) Message-ID: <1oe0pd$mu@tricky.wft.stack.urc.tue.nl> Date: 20 Mar 93 02:50:21 GMT References: <1993Mar19.074044.18995@gmd.de> Organization: Eindhoven University of Technology, the Netherlands Lines: 7 NNTP-Posting-Host: tar.wft.stack.urc.tue.nl In article <1993Mar19.074044.18995@gmd.de> veit@mururoa.gmd.de (Holger Veit) writes: > Why would *you* want to modify *default* protections in a system? Not me, but I can imagine sysadmins that would like to decide for themselves who is allowed to acces their tape unit. One possible solution would be to do a chmod from rc.local during boot. This would solve the problems I think.