Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.development Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!spool.mu.edu!caen!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!menudo.uh.edu!uuneo!sugar!peter From: peter@NeoSoft.com (Peter da Silva) Subject: Re: Some Sample Projects for 386BSD Organization: NeoSoft Communications Services -- (713) 684-5900 Date: Sun, 14 Mar 1993 05:03:24 GMT Message-ID: <C3v4pp.LHC@sugar.neosoft.com> References: <9303090526.AA07265@fubar.cs.montana.edu> <1nqplq$m11@sax.sax.de> Lines: 13 In article <1nqplq$m11@sax.sax.de> joerg@sax.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) writes: > Sorry, i just don't understand why we should walk back??? Only for > the gain of some speed? IMHO, mandoc isn't a bad thing, Mandoc is somewhat of an improvement, since it tags textual entities semantically rather than by format. Plus, there's work under way to produce and SGML DTD that's freely translatable with a slight variant of mandoc. -- Peter da Silva. <peter@sugar.neosoft.com>. `-_-' Oletko halannut suttasi tänään? 'U` Tarjoilija, tämä ateria elää vielä.