Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.bugs Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!uunet!gatekeeper.us.oracle.com!decwrl!amdcad!BitBlocks.com!bvs From: bvs@BitBlocks.com (Bakul Shah) Subject: Re: Disklabel help needed Message-ID: <C3x9JM.5LH@BitBlocks.com> Organization: Bit Blocks, Inc. References: <C3Lyuz.A4y@BitBlocks.com> <C3MwC4.ALy@sugar.neosoft.com> <C3uEzo.1J0@BitBlocks.com> <C3w6HC.9Eo@sugar.neosoft.com> Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1993 08:42:57 GMT Lines: 12 peter@NeoSoft.com (Peter da Silva) writes: >In article <C3uEzo.1J0@BitBlocks.com> bvs@BitBlocks.com (Bakul Shah) writes: >> I'd rather be able to boot from *any* partition so that I can >> boot even if one copy is trashed. >I don't see how that has any bearing whatsoever on anything I said. I'm >talking about "a place to put the boot blocks, volume label, partition >table, and so on". Nothing to do with where the kernel is. What I am saying is that I'd rather have bootblocks + label on every partition instead of a separate partition for them.