*BSD News Article 12376


Return to BSD News archive

Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions
Path: sserve!manuel.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!hp9000.csc.cuhk.hk!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!eng.ufl.edu!spool.mu.edu!sgiblab!pacbell.com!unet!blunt!dsilvia
From: dsilvia@blunt.net.com ()
Subject: Re: Disklabel/newfs -
Message-ID: <1993Mar5.152026.23758@unet.net.com>
Sender: news@unet.net.com
Nntp-Posting-Host: blunt
Organization: Network Equipment Technologies
References: <1993Mar4.062419.18727@oz.plymouth.edu> <1993Mar4.172411.28968@coe.montana.edu> <CGD.93Mar4205238@eden.CS.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 1993 15:20:26 GMT
Lines: 18

In article <CGD.93Mar4205238@eden.CS.Berkeley.EDU> cgd@eden.CS.Berkeley.EDU (Chris G. Demetriou) writes:
>In article <1993Mar4.172411.28968@coe.montana.edu> osyjm@cs.montana.edu (Jaye Mathisen) writes:
>>I have had nothing but grief whenever my disktab doesn't have d and
>>c partitions defined.  As soon as I defined them, voila'.
>
>"normal" bsd stuff uses the c partition to access the "whole disk" --
>disklabel needs this.
>
>386bsd also (<thwack!>) needs a d partition, something to do with DOS
>stuff...  (i guess "d" is supposed to be the "whole disk" and "c"
>is "the whole part of the disk allocated to 386bsd".)
>

Has the installation (or, at least, the INSTALL.NOTES) been modified to do this?
My installation from dist.fs only defined partitions a,b and c (with swap
starting at offset 0), DOS is the first 20Meg.

Dave S.