Return to BSD News archive
Received: by minnie.vk1xwt.ampr.org with NNTP id AA1946 ; Tue, 23 Feb 93 17:14:10 EST Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions Path: sserve!manuel.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!rpi!psinntp!psinntp!uuneo!sugar!karl From: karl@NeoSoft.com (Karl Lehenbauer) Subject: Re: Questions ???? Organization: NeoSoft Communications Services -- (713) 684-5900 Date: Mon, 22 Feb 1993 13:17:35 GMT Message-ID: <C2uq9D.272@sugar.neosoft.com> References: <1luvho$b4d@terminator.rs.itd.umich.edu> <1m5372INN1pd@lucy.ee.und.ac.za> <C2rnB3.JAH@lut.fi> Lines: 19 In article <C2rnB3.JAH@lut.fi> junki@lut.fi (Juha Nurmela) writes: >|> >|> Second I read in the comp.os.linux.FAQ that the FTP throughput in 386BSD >|> is only about 5Kb/Sec, is this true? How totally sucky! I sent a very polite, detailed posting to the Linux FAQ list maintainer, trying to clear up several innaccuracies regarding 386BSD. That they continue to leave that stuff in the Linux FAQ either points to no available time on the part of the FAQ list maintainer, or an intentional slander against a competitor. The thing that really bums me out is that Linux looks pretty cool, and there is no need for them to propagate false information about 386BSD to make it look bad. -- -- Email info@NeoSoft.com for info on getting interactive Internet access. "I didn't have time to write a short letter, so I wrote a long one instead." -- Twain