*BSD News Article 11671


Return to BSD News archive

Received: by minnie.vk1xwt.ampr.org with NNTP
	id AA1909 ; Tue, 23 Feb 93 15:03:34 EST
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions
Path: sserve!manuel.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!usenet.coe.montana.edu!nate
From: nate@cs.montana.edu (Nate Williams)
Subject: Re: Unstable system?
Message-ID: <1993Feb22.053302.9970@coe.montana.edu>
Sender: usenet@coe.montana.edu (USENET News System)
Organization: Dept. of Computer Science, MSU, Bozeman Mt 59717
References: <6385@krafla.rhi.hi.is>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 1993 05:33:02 GMT
Lines: 24

In article <6385@krafla.rhi.hi.is> adamd@rhi.hi.is (Adam David) writes:
>Is there any inherent reason why this combination of hardware / software
>crashes easily?
>
>Hardware: 33MHz cx486DLC + 387 (AMI BIOS) with 16 MB RAM 70ns.
>          all bios shadows disabled, (probably) no waitstate RAM.
>          (adaptec 1542B) SCSI hard disks and wd8003 ethernet, Boca io2x4
>          parallel / serial portsū. 
>          waitstate enabled on the ethernet bios.
>System: standard 386bsd distribution (bin01, src01, etc01) with no patches.
>        swapfile enabled on /dev/as0b (doesn't seem to make any difference).

The no patches installed is a real big reason, especially since you
have 16MB.   I'm suprised you've been able to use it at all.

Get the patch-kit from agate, apply the patches, and I think you'll be a lot
happier.


Nate
-- 
osynw@terra.oscs.montana.edu |  Still trying to find a good reason for
nate@cs.montana.edu          |  these 'computer' things.  Personally,
home #: (406) 586-0579       |  I don't think they'll catch on - Don H.