Return to BSD News archive
Received: by minnie.vk1xwt.ampr.org with NNTP id AA1684 ; Tue, 23 Feb 93 14:53:28 EST Path: sserve!manuel.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!agate!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!wupost!gumby!destroyer!news.itd.umich.edu!nosegoblin.css.itd.umich.edu!pauls From: pauls@css.itd.umich.edu (Paul Southworth) Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions Subject: Re: patch to vi editor Date: 19 Feb 1993 15:27:00 GMT Organization: University of Michigan ITD Consulting and Support Services Lines: 12 Message-ID: <1m2u84$b0s@terminator.rs.itd.umich.edu> References: <lo8q52INNgh@dimebox.cs.utexas.edu> <CGD.93Feb18210248@eden.CS.Berkeley.EDU> <1993Feb19.081154.1335@lth.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: nosegoblin.css.itd.umich.edu In article <1993Feb19.081154.1335@lth.se> jh@efd.lth.se (Joergen Haegg) writes: >Have you tried vim 1.24? >I have not seen any problem with vim yet. But it may be a bug in the >terminal-driver, anything is possible. I haven't tried vim, but I have experienced the vi problems that others have been talking about -- what you hit on, however, the the terminal-driver issue. I have found that vi on my machine is only flaky at console; from terminal windows on other machines it works like a charm. pauls@umich.edu