Return to BSD News archive
Received: by minnie.vk1xwt.ampr.org with NNTP id AA1172 ; Tue, 23 Feb 93 14:28:49 EST Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd Path: sserve!manuel.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!hp9000.csc.cuhk.hk!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!llyene!jato!ufo!seaview!kaleb From: kaleb@seaview (Kaleb Keithley) Subject: Re: Status of "official" 386BSD Message-ID: <1993Feb11.233543.23266@jpl-devvax.jpl.nasa.gov> Keywords: 386bsd, releases, patchkit Sender: usenet@jpl-devvax.jpl.nasa.gov (For NNTP so rrn will be able to post) Nntp-Posting-Host: seaview.jpl.nasa.gov Organization: Jet Propulsion Laboratory (NASA) References: <1leftoINNc8b@hpsdlss3.sdd.hp.com> Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1993 23:35:43 GMT Lines: 24 In article <1leftoINNc8b@hpsdlss3.sdd.hp.com> mattb@sdd.hp.com (Matt Bonner) writes: >Would anyone in the know care to comment on the release schedule >for 386BSD? A while ago I got a thank you letter for sending in >my two cents worth, and it mentioned something about an interim >release incorporating the patches everyone has come up with, but >I haven't seen anything about it on the net (apologies if I missed >it). I got the impression it was *not* 0.2, but rather a 0.1.1 >type of thing. Speaking of which, does anyone know anything about >the status of 0.2? Hear hear. I second the implicit motion. While I applaud the efforts of the people who have put together the "patchkit", I'm certain that you're going to confuse a lot of people by calling the sum of 0.1 plus the patchkit, "0.2". Or maybe Bill and Lynne's next release is going to be 0.3? Couldn't you refer to it as 0.1-plus or something along those lines. -- Kaleb Keithley kaleb@devvax.jpl.nasa.gov