Return to BSD News archive
Received: by minnie.vk1xwt.ampr.org with NNTP id AA1171 ; Tue, 23 Feb 93 14:28:45 EST Path: sserve!manuel.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!hp9000.csc.cuhk.hk!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!olivea!apple!mg From: mg@Apple.COM (Mark Gorlinsky) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd Subject: Re: Will 386bsd run for Pentium machine without pain? Message-ID: <78655@apple.apple.COM> Date: 12 Feb 93 00:42:17 GMT References: <1l284hINN8d8@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> <1993Feb7.081859.15543@netcom.com> <44714@sdcc12.ucsd.edu> Organization: Apple Computer Inc, Cupertino, CA Lines: 10 If don't optimize your code for the dual pipeline, the P5 turns out to be just a faster 486 with floating-point speed emprovements and seperate instruction/data caches. So, 386bsd should work just fine. -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- What I write is mine for you to read. What you read mind you, may not be right. ** NOTE ** I'm just a contractor, I don't claim to speek for Apple Computers. mg@apple.com --------------------------------------------------------------------------------