Return to BSD News archive
Received: by minnie.vk1xwt.ampr.org with NNTP id AA601 ; Fri, 05 Feb 93 22:00:32 EST Newsgroups: alt.suit.att-bsdi,comp.unix.bsd Path: sserve!manuel.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!uniwa!cujo!cc.curtin.edu.au!zrepachol From: zrepachol@cc.curtin.edu.au (Paul Repacholi) Subject: <None> Message-ID: <1993Feb5.172628.1@cc.curtin.edu.au> Lines: 15 Sender: news@cujo.curtin.edu.au (News Manager) Organization: Curtin University of Technology References: <106742@netnews.upenn.edu> <1993Jan27.215738.12384@igor.tamri.com> <1kbtpf$e9h@agate.berkeley.edu> <1993Feb3.175211.13214@igor.tamri.com> Date: Fri, 5 Feb 1993 08:26:28 GMT Part 4 fails on one simple, glaring error. The analogy to music and 'derived work' *IS EXPLICITLY DELT WITH IN THE LICENCE TERMS*. These *REQUIRE* that derived works be made freely available. The other point, since when have the Jolitezs been cited in the suit. I find it a little strange that this 'offer to settle' is 'independently put forward by an ex unix os developer. ~Paul PS. Just a small detqil, don't you think Novell/USL might be a little pissed of at the idea of their money going to AT&T as settlement? :-)